<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Total Pro Audio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.totalproaudio.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.totalproaudio.com</link>
	<description>Live Audio Reference</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:53:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Aux-Fed Subs by Was habt ihr heute so gelernt? - Seite 21 - Postpla.net - die Forum Community</title>
		<link>http://www.totalproaudio.com/206/system-design/aux-fed-subs/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Was habt ihr heute so gelernt? - Seite 21 - Postpla.net - die Forum Community</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalproaudio.com/?p=206#comment-387</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Console Gain Structure by Ste</title>
		<link>http://www.totalproaudio.com/297/mixing/console-gain-structure/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Ste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalproaudio.com/?p=297#comment-369</guid>
		<description>One of the techniques I used in the past was a similar idea, using the group masters almost as attenuators in order to get good input gain structure and faders in a useable range. I would always mix from the input faders though as the group outputs usually ended up with quite a wide range of values, with the lower ones not giving optimum resolution.

I concur about the power amp trims, though my reasoning is repeatability and consistency!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the techniques I used in the past was a similar idea, using the group masters almost as attenuators in order to get good input gain structure and faders in a useable range. I would always mix from the input faders though as the group outputs usually ended up with quite a wide range of values, with the lower ones not giving optimum resolution.</p>
<p>I concur about the power amp trims, though my reasoning is repeatability and consistency!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Console Gain Structure by Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.totalproaudio.com/297/mixing/console-gain-structure/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalproaudio.com/?p=297#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Excellent article....thanks! I personally prefer to set the gains at 0 on the meter (PFL), then set the faders at unity. Then I&#039;ll mix from the 4 groups (drums, guitar/bass, keys/tracks, and vocals). I run the master out at around -10/-5 depending on the venue size (power amp trims maxed out...have to, so that some drunken curious fool can&#039;t possible blow out our powered QSCs).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article&#8230;.thanks! I personally prefer to set the gains at 0 on the meter (PFL), then set the faders at unity. Then I&#8217;ll mix from the 4 groups (drums, guitar/bass, keys/tracks, and vocals). I run the master out at around -10/-5 depending on the venue size (power amp trims maxed out&#8230;have to, so that some drunken curious fool can&#8217;t possible blow out our powered QSCs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Aux-Fed Subs by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.totalproaudio.com/206/system-design/aux-fed-subs/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalproaudio.com/?p=206#comment-356</guid>
		<description>While I&#039;m no speaker designer, I don&#039;t believe that a band pass design is significantly more or less omnidirectional than a bass reflex or sealed enclosure for example. A folded horn design will be more directional, but you may still have problems with rear energy.

While I don&#039;t know your individual situation, in order to decrease subwoofer spill onto stage, it&#039;s important to consider positioning and arraying. Arranging and processing subwoofers in directional arrays will help considerably in directing energy where you want and perhaps more importantly, away from where you don&#039;t want it. Where this isn&#039;t possible, in small systems for example, consider that placing subs under the stage is likely to cause stage rumble and left/right stacks will cause a central power alley that will not only extend forward into the audience, but also back onto stage. Unfortunately, this is usually where the lead singer is!

In a left/right configuration, it may be possible to turn one side down by 3-6dB, which will decrease the power alley effect, but you may need to be careful of localisation problems. Some experimentation may be necessary!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m no speaker designer, I don&#8217;t believe that a band pass design is significantly more or less omnidirectional than a bass reflex or sealed enclosure for example. A folded horn design will be more directional, but you may still have problems with rear energy.</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t know your individual situation, in order to decrease subwoofer spill onto stage, it&#8217;s important to consider positioning and arraying. Arranging and processing subwoofers in directional arrays will help considerably in directing energy where you want and perhaps more importantly, away from where you don&#8217;t want it. Where this isn&#8217;t possible, in small systems for example, consider that placing subs under the stage is likely to cause stage rumble and left/right stacks will cause a central power alley that will not only extend forward into the audience, but also back onto stage. Unfortunately, this is usually where the lead singer is!</p>
<p>In a left/right configuration, it may be possible to turn one side down by 3-6dB, which will decrease the power alley effect, but you may need to be careful of localisation problems. Some experimentation may be necessary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Aux-Fed Subs by iminthemix</title>
		<link>http://www.totalproaudio.com/206/system-design/aux-fed-subs/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>iminthemix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalproaudio.com/?p=206#comment-352</guid>
		<description>Great article. I tend to use the subs under 70hz and as part of the system, not off an aux-buss. But here&#039;s the deal, I have had multiple complaints of stage rumble. I&#039;ve never had complaints of this nature nor have i ever used a bandpass sub. My assertion is the bandpass subs are very short throw and more omnidirectional than other low-freq cabs. Indeed there are many reasons for stage rumble but I simply wondered if you have found band-pass subs to be more troublesome than a front-load or horn regarding creating resonant stage problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. I tend to use the subs under 70hz and as part of the system, not off an aux-buss. But here&#8217;s the deal, I have had multiple complaints of stage rumble. I&#8217;ve never had complaints of this nature nor have i ever used a bandpass sub. My assertion is the bandpass subs are very short throw and more omnidirectional than other low-freq cabs. Indeed there are many reasons for stage rumble but I simply wondered if you have found band-pass subs to be more troublesome than a front-load or horn regarding creating resonant stage problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting into the Industry by Ben Ziarati</title>
		<link>http://www.totalproaudio.com/475/starting-out/getting-into-the-industry/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Ziarati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalproaudio.com/?p=475#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Cheers Steve,

What are you working on at the moment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers Steve,</p>
<p>What are you working on at the moment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Aux-Fed Subs by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.totalproaudio.com/206/system-design/aux-fed-subs/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalproaudio.com/?p=206#comment-282</guid>
		<description>Does that work well for you? I&#039;d imagine an extra 25Hz on the top end of a subwoofer wouldn&#039;t be enough to move the image sufficiently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does that work well for you? I&#8217;d imagine an extra 25Hz on the top end of a subwoofer wouldn&#8217;t be enough to move the image sufficiently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Aux-Fed Subs by Rick Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.totalproaudio.com/206/system-design/aux-fed-subs/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 04:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalproaudio.com/?p=206#comment-281</guid>
		<description>Very good article! I&#039;ve been playing with crossover points on our subs and I think I will lower them back down below 100hz. I have them at 125hz to help pull the image down because the mains are 20&#039; above the subs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good article! I&#8217;ve been playing with crossover points on our subs and I think I will lower them back down below 100hz. I have them at 125hz to help pull the image down because the mains are 20&#8242; above the subs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Phase or Polarity? by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.totalproaudio.com/30/basics/phase-or-polarity/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 12:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalproaudio.com/?p=30#comment-280</guid>
		<description>[...] button. http://www.moultonlabs.com/more/stereo_reconsidered/P4/ &quot;Phase or Polarity&quot; http://totalproaudio.com/30/basics/phase-or-polarity/ &quot;Polarity and Phase&quot; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] button. <a href="http://www.moultonlabs.com/more/stereo_reconsidered/P4/" rel="nofollow">http://www.moultonlabs.com/more/stereo_reconsidered/P4/</a> &quot;Phase or Polarity&quot; <a href="http://totalproaudio.com/30/basics/phase-or-polarity/" rel="nofollow">http://totalproaudio.com/30/basics/phase-or-polarity/</a> &quot;Polarity and Phase&quot; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting into the Industry by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.totalproaudio.com/475/starting-out/getting-into-the-industry/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 16:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalproaudio.com/?p=475#comment-272</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a hard one! The income for a sound tech can vary greatly, especially as a freelancer and it obviously depends on the amount and variety of work that you do. I would say if you work all year round and keep yourself fairly busy, you&#039;re looking in the region of £20,000 to £30,000 per year. You can earn way more than this if you have the right gig or you work flat out, but I think this is pretty average.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a hard one! The income for a sound tech can vary greatly, especially as a freelancer and it obviously depends on the amount and variety of work that you do. I would say if you work all year round and keep yourself fairly busy, you&#8217;re looking in the region of £20,000 to £30,000 per year. You can earn way more than this if you have the right gig or you work flat out, but I think this is pretty average.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

